US Senate Wants PFAS Banned From Cosmetics. Should FDA Have A Say?
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances are unpopular, sure. But there are thousands of PFAS with dissimilar safety profiles that merit US FDA review ahead of a blanket ban in cosmetic products, industry says.
You may also be interested in...
The US District Court for the Southern District of New York grants L’Oréal USA’s motion to dismiss a putative class action in which plaintiffs say they would not have purchased or paid a premium price for the firm’s waterproof mascaras had they known of the presence of PFAS. According to the judge, the amended complaint lacks crucial evidence even at the pleading stage.
Cosmetics companies that disclose the presence of PFAS in their products and explain measures they are taking to minimize PFAS’ presence are better protected from lawsuits, says Dentons US attorney Michael Duvall.
“We’ve been keeping tabs of the amount of products containing PFAS over the last several years and, unfortunately, we’re not seeing really a lot of it going away,” said Katz, director of the Office of Cosmetics and Colors, at the Independent Beauty Association’s Cosmetics Regulations Workshop.