Feinstein Bill Lacks ‘Crucial’ National Uniformity Assurance – ICMAD
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
Small-business trade group the Independent Cosmetic Manufacturers and Distributors says the Personal Care Products Safety Act would place an undue burden on small businesses and fails to address national uniformity issues. In an interview with “The Rose Sheet,” ICMAD President and CEO Pam Busiek discussed the group’s opposition to the bill and suggested that 2012’s Cosmetic Safety Amendments Act would have been a better starting point for legislation.
You may also be interested in...
Since 2012 when a House committee held the last cosmetics hearing, industry generally has warmed to – or resigned itself to – legislative proposals to update the cosmetics regulatory system. However, there is still not consensus on the details among big business, SMEs and consumer advocates, all of which will be represented at the Senate HELP Committee’s witness table.
The Environmental Working Group is targeting messaging to independent sales reps at Mary Kay’s annual seminar in an effort to rally support behind the Personal Care Products Safety Act. But Mary Kay’s beef with the proposed bill largely centers on federal preemption, an issue the Personal Care Products Council has suggested will likely drive reform negotiations in the 115th Congress.
During a March 1 press call, the Environmental Working Group highlighted findings from an 800-person survey indicating that 68% of men and women likely to vote this fall support increased government oversight of cosmetic chemicals. Senator Dianne Feinstein touted her proposed Personal Care Products Safety Act as the answer to consumer concerns, hopeful that a Senate committee hearing will be held in the spring.