Prop 65 andro litigation
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Executive Summary
California AG "has presented sufficient evidence to create a triable issue of material fact" on whether androstenedione fits within definition of "anabolic steroid," Oakland state court Judge Ronald Sabraw rules Nov. 5, denying supplement marketers' motion for summary judgment in Prop 65 case. Court says SB 1884, which was signed into law in September and requires special content and warning statements on supplements containing steroid hormone precursors, "does not compel the conclusion that andro cannot be an anabolic steroid" (1"The Tan Sheet" Oct. 7, 2002, p. 7). Trial in the case is scheduled for March...