Vision Health Supplements Blurry On AREDS Formulation – Study
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
A study finds claims for ocular supplements cited or relied on AREDS findings even when the products did not match the formulas assessed in the research by NIH’s National Eye Institute. The products emphasize AREDS but offer little information to consumers, they say.
You may also be interested in...
“MacuHealth believes challenged claims are thoroughly supported by the multitude of peer reviewed, published scientific studies” but NAD review on Vision Elements challenge finds firm’s research doesn’t support its claims.
After the Age-Related Eye Disease Study found lutein, zeaxanthin and omega-3s do not slow age-related macular degeneration, supplement firms revisit the data and find lutein and zeaxanthin could slow the disease in deficient populations.
Promotions for Bausch & Lomb's new Ocuvite PreserVision containing vitamins C and E, beta carotene, zinc and copper likely will stress the product's clinically proven eye health benefits.