HBW Insight is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By


FDA Preemption Comment Could Sway California Against Prop 65 Warnings For Acetaminophen

Executive Summary

 Food and drug attorneys suggest it is unlikely California will require Prop 65 warnings on OTC acetaminophen products after FDA tells the state that warnings would violate federal regulations. FDA also says sciences doesn't support a conclusion acetaminophen can cause cancer and that the warnings would confuse consumers.

You may also be interested in...

California Prop 65 Complaints Against OTC Generics? Ranitidine Could Be First And Last Target

Marketers of copies of national brand OTCs are required under FDA regulations to use the same labeling as the brand, a rule that in effect has limited complaints in California state court alleging Prop 65 violations with nonprescription drug labeling to targeting branded product marketers.

Acetaminophen Could Have Exemption ‘Qualifications’ If Added To Prop 65

If acetaminophen is added to California's Prop 65 list, it would likely be a qualified listing, requiring OTC marketers only warn consumers under special circumstances, says a consumer products lawyer. Listing could spur argument between stakeholders and the state over FDA labeling pre-emption.

Neutrogena Pre-emption Defense Stands On California State Court Appeal

The FDA Modernization Act promotes regulatory uniformity and pre-empts litigation seeking changes to J&J/Neutrogena sunscreen labeling claims beyond FDA requirements, a California state appellate court says. OTC drug and cosmetic firms have been less successful with pre-emption arguments in other cases.

Related Content


Latest Headlines
See All



Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts