HBW Insight is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

After US FDA Objects To CBD Safety As NDIs, Supplement Industry Responds, What Else Is New?

Executive Summary

Rejection of two firms’ proposals for using hemp-derived CBD in supplement isn’t stirring US businesses selling CBD supplements to pull products from market. For one firm that filed an unsuccessful NDI notification for full-spectrum hemp extract CBD, FDA rejection was agenda item with numerous other business, regulatory and legislative developments in its latest quarter.

You may also be interested in...



Bill Steering Hemp In Supplements To NDI Notification Pathway Introduced For Third Time

Virginia Republican Morgan Griffith has same message for FDA he’s previously stated about hemp ingredients. Agency “has dragged its feet in properly regulating CBD and hemp-derived products on the market, creating confusion about its legal uses,” he says.

HempFusion Publishes CBD GRAS As Food For Thought On NDI Notification It's Ready To Serve

Denver firm recently announced self-affirmed GRAS for proprietary hemp-derived CBD extract. “I have access now to food, beverage and I can add to a dietary supplement my extract as a food additive ingredient,” says CEO Jason Mitchell. While GRAS is a US regulatory pathway for food, currently none is available for lawful use of hemp-derived ingredients in supplements.

NDI Notifications For CBD ‘Excluded’ On Arrival But US FDA Still Explains Where Safety Evidence Fails

CFSAN Office of Dietary Supplement Programs tells Charlotte’s Web and Irwin Naturals that not providing sufficient evidence of a reasonable assumption of safety for an NDI's intended use wasn’t the only reason each notification was rejected.

Related Content

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

RS151658

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel